Nonverbal Communication of Supervisors in The Mentoring Thesis Process: Perceptions Of English Students

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Meilan Nirmala Shinta
Besse Darmawati

Abstract

The study examines students' perceptions on the thesis mentoring
process regarding their nonverbal communication patterns in the English study
program, FKIP of Halu Oleo University. The scope and focus are kinesics,
proxemics, oculesics, chronemics, paralanguage, and physical appearance.This
study apply a qualitative approach. The data obtained employing interview and
documentation are then analyzed by Miles and Huberman's theory using reduction,
reporting, and verification. The subjects of the study are eight graduated students
and two students in the mentoring process. The study results shows that the six
types of nonverbal which are most likely to be experienced more often and
influentially are ‘kinesics’, which is like the supervisor's attitude serving the
students. Other nonverbal types continue to take on roles but are not as influential
as kinesics. This study reveals that the importance of communication is able to
increase student attention and motivation in constructing ideas gained from their
supervisors when the communication process is going well and vice versa. 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shinta, M. N., & Darmawati, B. (2021). Nonverbal Communication of Supervisors in The Mentoring Thesis Process: Perceptions Of English Students. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v6i1.1347

References

Atmowardoyo, H. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori Dasar. Badan Penerbit UNM.
Aysenil, Barabar; Cagda Kivanc, C. (2016). Using Nonverbal Communication in Efl Classes Aysenil. January.
Ballendat, T., Marquardt, N., & Greenberg, S. (2010). Proxemic interaction: Designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1936652.1936676
Buck, R., & VanLear, C. A. (2002). Verbal and nonverbal communication: Distinguishing symbolic, spontaneous, and pseudo-spontaneous nonverbal behavior. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.3.522
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating, Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
Cruz, W. (2001). Differences in nonverbal communication styles between cultures: The latino-anglo perspective. Leadership and Management in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2001)1:4(51)
Danesi, M. (2006). Proxemics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01441-3
Döring, N., & Pöschl, S. (2017). Nonverbal cues in mobile phone text messages: The effects of chronemics and proxemics. In The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134499-6
Frati, V., & Prattichizzo, D. (2011). Using Kinect for hand tracking and rendering in wearable haptics. 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference, WHC 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2011.5945505
Greenberg, S., Marquardt, N., Ballendat, T., Diaz-Marino, R., & Wang, M. (2011). Proxemic interactions. Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1145/1897239.1897250
Hong Li, P. (2011). Effects of Nonverbal Communication on College English Classroom Teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 9(8), 505–516.
Indrawan, I. P., Nitiasih, P. K., & Piscayanti, K. S. (2017). an Analysis of Teachers’ Non-Verbal Communication in Efl Classroom At Smp Negeri 3 Banjar. Prasi, 12(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v12i01.13912
Kendon, A. (2018). Review of birdwhistell ’ s ‘ kinesics and context .’ January 1972.
Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (1972). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. In Dress as NonVerbal Communication.
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017). Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.002
Lustig, Myron W, J. K. (2010). Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Communication Across Cultures.
Mahmud, M. (2017). Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Phoenix Publisher.
Mandal, F. B. (2014). Nonverbal Communication in Humans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
Matthew B.M., A.M Huberman, Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publication,Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Negi, J. S. (1970). The Role of Teachers’ Non-Verbal Communication in ELT Classroom. Journal of NELTA. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v14i1.3096
Pan, Q. (2014). Nonverbal Teacher-Student Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom: Theory and Practice. English Language Studeis, 4(12), 2627–2632.
Patterson, M. L. (2016). Nonverbal communication. In The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.06502-0
Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal Communication across Disciplines: Paralanguage, kinesics, silence, personal and environmental interaction. In Notes.
Ranta, R., & Harmawati, D. (2017). Analyzing Teacher’S Instructional and Nonverbal Communication in Efl Classroom. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 4(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.24843/ljlc.2017.v04.i02.p05
Schneider, O., MacLean, K., Swindells, C., & Booth, K. (2017). Haptic experience design: What hapticians do and where they need help. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.004
Sullivan, L. (2012). Oculesics. In The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412972024.n1752

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License