Determinan Peningkatan Kinerja Bisnis : Model Kontinjensi Akuntansi Manajemen Strategik

Authors

  • Nurhidayah Nurhidayah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Ismail Badollahi Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30603/ab.v18i2.3069

Keywords:

business performance, contingencies, strategic management accounting

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the determinants that can improve business performance. Theoretically, the characteristics of managers and competition are determinants that have an effective impact on improving business performance, especially for MSME entities, but in practice these determinants cannot work without conditional factors to support business performance improvement. The contingency approach is a strategic management accounting point of view that is appropriate in explaining how each determinant of business performance can work effectively. This research is explanatory research that uses a survey approach to test a research model. The research sample is MSME actors in Gowa Regency with criteria that meet the requirements to answer the survey instrument. The results of the study found that strategic management accounting has a direct effect on business performance. In addition, competition affects business performance through strategic management accounting. However, the characteristics of managers do not affect business performance through strategic management accounting. This can be used as a motivation for business people to continue to carry out self-development by way of business training, continue to add insight and experience and continue to innovate product development, in this way it is expected to improve business performance.

 Keywords: business performance, contingencies, strategic management accounting

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003

Chenhall, R. H. (2007). The contingent design of performance measures. Contemporary Issues in Management Accounting, 28, 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283361.003.0005

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dang, L. A., Le, T. M. H., Le, T. H., & Pham, T. B. T. (2021). The effect of strategic management accounting on business performance of sugar enterprises in vietnam. Accounting, 7(5), 1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.2.031

Ghasemi, R., Mohamad, N. A., Karami, M., Bajuri, N. H., & Asgharizade, E. (2016). The mediating effect of management accounting system on the relationship between competition and managerial performance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2015-0030

Hadid, W., & Al-Sayed, M. (2021). Management accountants and strategic management accounting: The role of organizational culture and information systems. Management Accounting Research, 50(November 2020), 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100725

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review.

Handojono, M., Cornelis, V., & Ambon, P. N. (2021). Pengujian Model Kontijensi Akuntansi Manajemen Stratejik terhadap Kinerja UKM di Maluku. 12(2).

Hoque, Z. (2011). The relations among competition, delegation, management accounting systems change and performance: A path model. Advances in Accounting, 27(2), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2011.05.006

Kalkhouran, A. A. N., Rasid, S. Z. A., Sofian, S., & Nedaei, B. H. N. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Use of Strategic Management Accounting in Small and Medium Enterprises. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 35(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21644

Md. Auzair, S., Amiruddin, R., Majid, A. A., & Maelah, R. (2013). Linking business strategy to management accounting: A study in Malaysian service organizations. Jurnal Pengurusan, 37(July 2016), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2013-37-05

Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. In Readings in accounting for management control (pp. 83–106). Springer.

Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249.

Rekarti, E., & Doktoralina, C. M. (2017). Improving Business Performance: A Proposed Model for SMEs. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/732

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business.

Walker, K., Fleischman, G., & Johnson, E. (2012). Measuring Management Accounting Service Quality. Management Accounting…, 13(3), 15–28. http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-298614232/measuring-management-accounting-service-quality

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Nurhidayah, N., & Badollahi, I. . (2022). Determinan Peningkatan Kinerja Bisnis : Model Kontinjensi Akuntansi Manajemen Strategik. Al-Buhuts, 18(2), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.30603/ab.v18i2.3069

Issue

Section

Articles