Pengaruh Sistem Tirani Dalam Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja dan Loyalitas Anggota : Kepercayaan pada Pemimpin Sebagai Variabel Intervening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30603/ab.v21i1.6437Kata Kunci:
Tyrannical Leadership, Leader Trust, Performance, LoyaltyAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh langsung Kepemimpinan Tirani terhadap Kepercayaan Pimpinan, Kinerja, dan Loyalitas, serta mengevaluasi peran mediasi Kepercayaan Pimpinan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan populasi anggota Polri dan sampel yang ditentukan melalui teknik purposive sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan metode Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kepemimpinan Tirani tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Kepercayaan Pimpinan dan Loyalitas, tetapi berpengaruh signifikan dengan efek kecil terhadap Kinerja. Sebaliknya, Kepercayaan Pimpinan memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan besar terhadap Kinerja dan Loyalitas. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya kepercayaan sebagai elemen kunci dalam meningkatkan kinerja dan loyalitas bawahan, serta menunjukkan bahwa gaya kepemimpinan tirani kurang efektif dalam menciptakan hubungan kerja yang produktif. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan Polri untuk menerapkan gaya kepemimpinan berbasis kepercayaan dengan fokus pada komunikasi yang transparan, konsistensi, dan penciptaan lingkungan kerja yang adil dan mendukung.
Referensi
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2015). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and
Managerial Applications. New York: Free Press.
Campbell, J. P. (2015). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 687–732). APA.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G.
A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2012). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust
propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 935–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029360
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2012). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 935–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029360
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2009). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3),
297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–
628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2016). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002
Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly,
6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2018). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.007
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi [KemenPAN-RB]. (2022). Reformasi birokrasi Polri menuju institusi profesional. Jakarta: KemenPAN- RB.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010379308 Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In H. A. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 1–40). Springer.
Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1742715008098312
Schilling, J. (2017). From ineffectiveness to destructiveness: A conceptual framework for the definition, assessment, and study of destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 637–656 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.008
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2015). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. V., & Chatla, S. B. (2019). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 105, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.011.
Suharyanto. (2021). Meningkatkan SDM Polri melalui program pelatihan kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Polri Press.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Irwan Tahir, Suriyanti Suriyanti, Serlin Serang
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
