THE URGENCY OF EDUCATIONAL SUPERVISION IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LEARNING IN SCHOOLS
THE URGENCY OF EDUCATIONAL SUPERVISION IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LEARNING IN SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30603/tjmpi.v14i3.7586Keywords:
supervisi pendidikan, kualitas pembelajaran, profesionalisme guruAbstract
The quality of learning in schools is strongly influenced by teachers’ competencies and the effectiveness of professional guidance they receive. In practice, educational supervision in Indonesia is still predominantly administrative and has not been optimally utilized to improve learning quality. This article aims to examine the urgency of educational supervision in enhancing learning quality in schools and to identify challenges and optimization strategies relevant to the Indonesian educational context. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by analyzing academic books, journal articles, and educational policy documents. Data were analyzed thematically to identify key concepts, roles, and implications of educational supervision for learning quality. The findings indicate that educational supervision implemented through academic, clinical, collaborative, and reflective approaches significantly contributes to improving teachers’ pedagogical competence, student engagement, instructional innovation, and learning outcomes. Moreover, supervision functions as a crucial link between educational policies, particularly the Merdeka Curriculum, and classroom practices. The study highlights that humanistic, participatory, and sustainable educational supervision is a strategic instrument for improving learning quality and strengthening teacher professionalism in schools.
References
Addini, A. F., Husna, A. F., Damayanti, B. A., Fani, B. I., Nihayati, C. W. N. W., Daniswara, D. A., et al. (2022). Konsep dasar supervisi pendidikan. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 9(2), 179–186.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2010). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Engkoswara, & Komariah, A. (2010). Administrasi pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hasanah, S. (2020). Tantangan supervisi pendidikan di Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kurniasih, A. (2020). Motivasi kerja guru dalam supervisi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 12(2).
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nealey, R. L., & Evans, W. H. (1980). Handbook for effective supervision of instruction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Purwanto, N. (2012). Administrasi dan supervisi pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Purwanto, N. (2021). Supervisi pendidikan di era digital. Jurnal Supervisi Pendidikan.
Rohman. (2020). Supervisi pendidikan dalam perspektif global. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan.
Sahertian, P. A. (2010). Konsep dasar dan teknik supervisi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Slamet. (2017). Pengembangan profesional guru. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sudjana, N. (2012). Supervisi pendidikan: Konsep dan aplikasinya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsaputra, U. (2015). Supervisi pendidikan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Suparlan. (2015). Manajemen berbasis sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Supriyadi. (2018). Supervisi akademik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyadi. (2019). Supervisi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sutisna. (1983). Administrasi pendidikan: Dasar teoretis untuk praktik profesional. Bandung: Angkasa.
Yamin, M., & Maisah. (2010). Standar kinerja guru. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.









