Uncovering the Investigator’s Assumptions in Sexual Violence Crime Investigative Interviews: A Forensic Linguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Dhion Meitreya Vidhiasi a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:33:"Akademi Maritim Nusantara Cilacap";}

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i1.5918

Keywords:

Assumption;, investigator;, investigative interview;, sexual violence crime

Abstract

Background: The information supplied by a victim of sexual violence during an investigative interview frequently serves as the sole foundation for investigators in processing a sexual violence case. Nonetheless, the investigative interview process often lacks professionalism due to efforts to impose the investigator’s personal assumptions.

Aims: This research is a forensic language analysis intended to uncover the assumptions held by an investigator during an investigative interview with a child victim of sexual violence.

Methods: This study utilized qualitative data obtained from the investigative interview between an investigator and a child victim of sexual violence at a police station in Cilacap. Conversation data were collected using listening and note-taking techniques. The statistics were subsequently verified with the investigator to validate their legitimacy. This study employs the dialogic speech act theory technique proposed by Weigand (2010) to elucidate the assumptions held by the researcher.

Results: The findings of this study suggested that the investigator attempted to impose her personal assumptions on the victim through numerous exploratory speech acts designed to validate, offer options, and direct the victim’s responses.

Implications: The findings of this study may serve as a reference in assessing the specifics of inquiries within the Standard Operational Procedure on Examination and questioning techniques during the investigative interview procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, F. A., & Wulandari, D. A. (2011). Studi kualitatif tentang teknik interogasi terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pada tahap penyidikan. Proyeksi, 6(1), 27–39. https://psikologi.unissula.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/61dyah-astorini-teknik-interogasi-27-39-.pdf

Bachari, A. D., Sudana, D., & Gunawan, W. (2019). Ragam dan arah pertanyaan penyidik dalam berita acara pemeriksaan perkara pidana anak. Linguistik Indonesia, 36(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i1.73

Badan Resor Kriminal Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Standard Operasional Prosedure Pemeriksaan. https://123dok.com/document/y4e01xvq-menetapkan-peraturan-kepala-badan-reserse-kriminal-kepolisian.html

Chaer, A. (2011). Tata bahasa praktis bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS4679.JATIM000000000034159

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. PEARSON. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134458966.pdf

Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396826

Garg, A. (2023). Policies and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). In: Monitoring Tools for Setting up the Hospital Project . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6203-7_17

Heydon, G. (2012). Helping the police with their enquiries: Enhancing the investigative interview with linguistic research. The Police Journal, 85(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2012.85.2.581

Hisbah, H., & Enny, N. (2022). Penegakkan hukum bagi pelaku tindak pidana kekerasan seksual terhadap anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(1), 370. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i1.1965

Jaringan Masyarakat Sipil dan Komnas Perempuan. (2020). Naskah Akademik dan Naskah Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual.https://komnasperempuan.go.id/download-file/1025

Korkman, J., Otgaar, H., Geven, L. M., Bull, R., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Mäkelä, J.-M., Mattison, M., Milne, R., Santtila, P., Van Koppen, P., Memon, A., Danby, M., Filipovic, L., Garcia, F. J., Gewehr, E., Gomes Bell, O., Järvilehto, L., Kask, K., … Volbert, R. (2024). White paper on forensic child interviewing: Research-based recommendations by the European Association of Psychology and Law. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2324098

Korkman, J., Santtila, P., Westeråker, M., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2008). Interviewing techniques and follow-up questions in child sexual abuse interviews. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620701210460

Mulyasari, D., & Andriasari, D. (2023). Akuntabilitas penyidikan tindak pidana kekerasan seksual di Polrestabes Bandung untuk mewujudkan perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.4898

Muniroh, R. D. D. (2019). ‘It’s Better to See a Tiger than a Police Officer’: Adapting the Cognitive Interview Technique to the Indonesian Policing Context [Unpublished Dissertation]. RMIT University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/200769789.pdf

Muniroh, R. D. D., & Heydon, G. (2022). Addressing the gap between principles and practices in police interviewing in Indonesia. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09474-7

Nina. (2020). Kajian semantik pada pertanyaan interogatif polisi dalam kasus engeline. Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa XIII, 715-720. Diambil dari https://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/933

Nurisman, E. (2022). Risalah tantangan penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan seksual pasca lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.170-196

Pandean, M. L. M. (2018). Kalimat tanya dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Kajian Linguistik, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.35796/kaling.5.3.2018.25030

Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana. https://www.peraturanpolri.com/2019/12/perkap-6-tahun-2019-penyidikan-tindak-pidana.html

Sari, A. W., Satini, R., & Sartika, R. (2024). Types of judges’ questions in evidentiary hearings at the district court. Jurnal Kata, 8(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v8i1.2701

Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843692.001.0001

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS3189.slims-5915

Sumampouw, N. E. J., Otgaar, H., La Rooy, D., & De Ruiter, C. (2020). The quality of forensic child interviewing in child sexual abuse cases in Indonesia. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09342-5

Tsoumou, J. M. (2020). Analysing speech acts in politically related Facebook communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.004

Vaughan, M., Milne, R., Cherryman, J., & Dalton, G. (2024). Managing investigative interviews with vulnerable suspects in the UK: do specialist interview managers (IM’s) understand vulnerability? Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2341078

Vidhiasi, D. M. (2024). Realisasi tuturan dalam wawancara penyidikan tindak pidana kekerasan seksual [Unpublished Dissertation]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://repository.upi.edu/122401/

Weigand, E. (2010). Dialogue: The mixed game. John Benjamins Pub. Co.https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10

Yeschke, C. L. (2003). The art of investigative interviewing: A human approach to testimonial evidence (2nd ed). Butterworth-Heinemann.https://books.google.co.id/books/about/The_Art_of_Investigative_Interviewing.html?id=ab0emxiutXcC&redir_esc=y

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Vidhiasi, D. M. (2025). Uncovering the Investigator’s Assumptions in Sexual Violence Crime Investigative Interviews: A Forensic Linguistic Analysis. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 10(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i1.5918