Evaluating higher-order thinking skills representation in the 2022 Quadra Arabic language textbooks for Indonesian Madrasah Aliyah

Authors

  • Khusnul Masrifah Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Mohammad Ahsanuddin Arabic Language Teaching Study Program, Faculty of Literature, State University of Malang
  • Hanik Mahliatussikah Arabic Language Teaching Study Program, Faculty of Literature, State University of Malang
  • Zawawi Ismail Language and Literacy Education, University of Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i2.6703

Keywords:

Arabic language book;, higher-order thinking skills;, practice questions

Abstract

Background: In today’s era, where critical thinking and problem-solving are vital competencies, the integration of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) into educational resources, particularly textbooks, has become an important benchmark for quality learning.

Aims: This study aims to identify HOTS exercises in Arabic textbooks of Madrasah Aliyah class X published by Quadra in 2022 in terms of Bloom's revised taxonomy theory at the cognitive level of C4, or Analysing, C5, Evaluating, and C6 Creating.

Methods: This research employs document analysis techniques (content analysis) within a qualitative descriptive approach to examine the object in depth using primary data. The researcher directly observed the book's content and analysed the HOTS elements in the exercise questions. These were then categorised according to the levels of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, and conclusions were drawn based on the classifications.

Results: The results reveal that although HOTS elements are present in each theme, they are relatively few. The distribution shows C4 (2.4%), C5 (5.2%), and C6 (9.1%), indicating a predominance of LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) over HOTS.

Implications: The findings imply the need for improvement and development of question exercises in Arabic textbooks to include aspects of higher order thinking skills (HOTS), especially at the C4 (analyze), C5 (evaluate), and C6 (create) levels, in order to support more critical, analytical, and creative learning in accordance with the demands of the 21st century curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainin, M. (2023). Penilaian berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) dalam pembelajaran bahasa arab (T. C. B. Sejahtera (ed.); 2nd ed.). CV. Bintang Sejahtera. https://cvbintangsejahtera.com/penilaian-berpikir-tingkat-tinggi-hots-dalam-pembelajaran-bahasa-arab

Al-Khawaldeh, M., N. & A.-M. (2021). Cognitive level analysis of English language textbooks in Jordanian schools. theory and practice in language studies, 11(5), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1105.04

Alamer, A. (2021). The role of the L2 motivational self system in developing speaking confidence among saudi EFL students. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820918436

Alenezi, M., A. & A. (2022). Evaluation of HOTS in arabic secondary textbooks based on bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1537a

Alrabai, F. (2020). Promoting HOTS in language learning: evidence from arabic instruction. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.18

Alrabai, F. (2022). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training in enhancing the reading comprehension of Saudi EFL students. International Journal of Educational Research, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101925

Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1095725.pdf

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman Publishing.

Arif W. A., Abidah, Z., Fahmi, N., & Chebaiki, H. (2021). Development of arabic learning design based on higher order thinking skill with discovery learning model. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 7(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2021.071-02

Bano, I. (2023). Analyzing higher order thinking skills in english textbooks in pakistan. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1628a

Basuony, M. A. K., EmadEldeen, R. E., Farooq, M. B., El-Bassiouny, N., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2021). The role of higher education in preparing students for the workforce: the case of Egypt. higher education, skills and work-based learning, 11(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2019-0124

Bittar, M. (2022). A methodological proposal for textbook analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1555

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st-century skills: focus on assessment. In Center for Universal Education at Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/education-system-alignment-for-21st-century-skills-focus-on-assessment/

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Faizah, R. N. (2022). HOTS content analysis in indonesian language textbooks. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12962

Fanani, M. Z. (2018). Strategi pengembangan soal HOTS pada kurikulum 2013. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 2(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582

Giannakopoulos, A., Koutsoupidou, T., & Kakarougkas, A. (2022). Revisiting curriculum design: the role of creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration in the 21st-century classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101054

Hariadi, B., Jatmiko, B., Sunarto, M. J. D., Prahani, B. K., Sagirani, T., Amelia, T., & Lemantara, J. (2022). Higher order thinking skills based learning outcomes improvement with blended web mobile learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15231a

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Beltz.

Meliala, A. S. P. (2023). Muatan HOTS pada latihan soal buku teks bahasa arab kelas VI madrasah ibtidaiyah kemenag. Jurnal Matluba: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 1(1).

Mitarlis, M., Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of new inquiry-based learning (NIBL) for improving multiple higher-order thinking skills (M-HOTS) of prospective chemistry teachers.European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1309–1325. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1309

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International results in mathematics and science. in international association for the evaluation of educational achievement. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: combined executive summaries. in organisation for economic co-operation and development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

Pratiwi, Y., Yulia, S. R., & Ramli, R. (2020). Needs analysis in development of physics student books based on STEM approach for 11th grade senior high school. Journal of P ysics: Conference Series, 1481(1), 12066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012066

Rahmawati, N. (2018). Pembelajaran bahasa arab: menuju higher order thinking skills (HOTS). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 6.

Rintayati, P., Lukitasari, H., & Syawaludin, A. (2021). Development of two-tier multiple choice test to assess indonesian elementary students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14133a

Sari, L. E., & Pratiwi, D., M. (2023). Distribution of higher order thinking questions in bahasa indonesia textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 30(4), 88–105. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.

Suvina, N., & Ramly. (2021). Analisis pertanyaan hots buku teks mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia SMK/MAK kelas X terbitan erlangga. Indonesia: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59562/indonesia.v2i1.19292

Tamam, F. F., & Ainin, M. (2023). Pola soal soal HOTS kitab al-‘Arabiyyah bayna yadaik Jilid 1-3. JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 3(9), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v3i92023p1339-1354

Usman, H. (2005). Manajemen: teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Yaniawati, P., Maat, S. M., Supianti, I. I., & Fisher, D. (2021). Mathematics mobile blended learning development: student-oriented high order thinking skill learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.69

Zubaidah, Z., Ainin, M., Muassomah, M., Albantani, A. M., & Maimunah, I. (2022). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) level instructional book of Arabic language at senior high school. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 9(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i2.28184

Downloads

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

Masrifah, K., Ahsanuddin, M., Mahliatussikah, H., & Ismail, Z. (2025). Evaluating higher-order thinking skills representation in the 2022 Quadra Arabic language textbooks for Indonesian Madrasah Aliyah. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 10(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i2.6703