Determinasi Illicit Enrichment dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Mohamad Said Al-Hamid

Abstract

This study aims to elaborate on whether the criminalization of illicit enrichment has the potential to be an efficient and balanced action against corruption crimes, especially by public officials and to offer alternative formulations of illicit enrichment arrangements in corruption law as an effort to eradicate crime corruption in Indonesia. This study discusses the differences in the formulation of offenses in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes illicit enrichment in United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and offer alternative formulations of illicit enrichment in corruption laws. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a contextual approach. The results of the study show that Indonesia has ratified the concept of illicit enrichment in the UNCAC but has not regulated further illicit enrichment in its national law. Even though Indonesia has regulated its provisions in Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Law, these provisions still have weaknesses and have not accommodated the concept of illicit enrichment contained in the UNCAC. Therefore, in the following discussion, the authors offer the illicit enrichment offense formulation as an effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Hamid, M. S. (2022). Determinasi Illicit Enrichment dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Al-Mizan (e-Journal), 18(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v18i2.2900
Section
Articles

References

Ajie, Radita. “Kriminalisasi Perbuatan Pengayaan Diri Pejabat Publik Secara Tidak Wajar (Illicit Enrichment) Dalam Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi 2003 (UNCAC) Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 12, no. 3 (2015): 1–23.

Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Ali, Nuralia Jamila. “A Comparative Analysis of Corruption Between Muslim And Western Countries.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Islamic and Humanities 4, no. 1 (2022): 1–10.

Alkostar, Artidjo. “Korelasi Korupsi Politik Dengan Hukum Dan Pemerintahan Di Negara Modern (Telaah Tentang Praktik Korupsi Politik Dan Penanggulangannya).” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 16, no. edisi khusus (2009): 155–179.

———. “Memperkaya Diri Secara Tidak Sah (Illicit Enrichment) Dan Memperdagangkan Pengaruh (Trading Influence)” (2019): 1–27. https://law.uii.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Unsur-Melawan-Hukum-Tipikor-Dr.-Artidjo-Alkostar-fh-uii.pdf.

Amrulloh, Moh. Asyiq. “Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Fiqh.” In Fiqh Korupsi: Amanah VS Kekuasaan, edited by Ervyn Kaffah and Moh. Asyiq Amrulloh. Cet. 1. Mataram: Solidaritas Masyarakat Transparansi NTB, 2003.

Boles, Jeffrey R. “Criminalizing The Problem Of Unexplained Wealth: Illicit Enrichment Offenses And Human Rights Violations.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 17, no. 835 (2014): 1–39.

———. “Easing the Tension Between Statutes of Limitations and the Continuing Offense Doctrine.” Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy 7, no. 219 (2012): 1–39. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/ njlsp/vol7/iss2/1.

Gusti. “Uang Negara Hilang Rp 250 Triliun Akibat Korupsi.” Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta, July 25, 2013. https://www.ugm.ac.id/id/berita/8043-uang-negara-hilang-rp-250-triliun-akibat-korupsi.

Harahap, Hakim Muda. Ayat-Ayat Korupsi. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 2009.

Indonesia Corruption Watch. “Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2021.” Indonesia Corruption Watch. Last modified 2022. https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Tren Penindakan 2021.pdf.

Irfan, M. Nurul. Korupsi Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Amzah, 2014.

Istiqomah, Milda. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pengaturan ‘Illicit Enrichment’ Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, no. 1 (2016): 79.

Jorge, Guillermo. “The Romanian Legal Framework on Illicit Enrichment,” no. July (2007): 60.

Kamunde, Nelly Gacheri. “The Crime Of Illicit Enrichment Under International Anti-Corruption Legal Regime.” National Council for Law Reporting Kenya Law. http://kenyalaw.org/kl/index.php?id=1891.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Menggagas Perubahan UU Tipikor : Kajian Akademik Dan Draf Usulan Perubahan, 2019.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, and Etty R. Agoes. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2015.

Latumeten, Junior Willem John. “Kekayaan Yang Tidak Dapat Dipertanggungjawabkan (Illicit Enrichment) Sebagai Salah Satu Cara Dalam Memberantas Korupsi.” Lex Privatum 5, no. 2 (2017).

Lopa, Baharuddin. Kejahatan Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Kompas, 2001.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI). Fatwa Musyawarah Nasional VI Majelis Ulama Indonesia Tentang Risywah (Suap) Ghulul (Korupsi) Dan Hadiah Kepada Pejabat. Jakarta, 2000.

Miantoro, Bayu. “Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Di Indonesia.” Veritas et Justitia 6, no. 1 (2020): 150–171.

Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat. “Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum.” Jambura Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 68–93.

Munir, Abdulloh. “Analysis of Text and Context Approaches in Islamic Law about Corruption Cases.” Al-Mizan 13, no. 1 (2017): 101–120.

Muzila, Lindy, Michelle Morales, Marianne Mathias, and Tammar Berger. On the Take: Criminalizing Illicit Enrichment to Fight Corruption (Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Series), 2012.

Palguna, I.D.G. Hukum Internasional, Aspek-Aspek Teoretik Dan Penerapannya. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2019.

Palma, Alvon Kurnia, Lais Abid, Sely Martini, Hifdzil Alim, and Febri Diansyah. Implementasi Dan Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment (Peningkatan Kekayaan Secara Tidak Sah) Di Indonesia, 2014.

Putra, Diky Anandya Kharystya, and Vidya Prahassacitta. “Tinjauan Atas Kriminalisasi Illicit Enrichment Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Dengan Australia.” Indonesia Criminal Law Review 1, no. 1 (2021): 43–59. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/iclr/.

Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Juncto Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” n.d.

Schroth, Peter W, and Ana Daniela Bostan. “International Constitutional Law And Anti-Corruption Measures In The European Union’s Accession Negotiations: Romania In Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Comparative Law 52, no. 625 (2004): 1–76.

Shaid, Nur Jamal. “Mengenal Apa Itu Aset Likuid Dan Urgensinya Dalam Investasi.” Kompas.Com, December 7, 2021. https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/12/07/151819726/mengenal-apa-itu-aset-likuid-dan-urgensinya-dalam-investasi?page=all#:~:text=Sederhananya%2C likuid adalah aset yang,cair%2C atau dalam bentuk cair.

Siegel, Larry J. Criminology: Theories, Patterns, and Typologies. Belmont: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning, 2010.

United Nations. “United Nations Convention Against Corruption.” United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Last modified 2004. https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf.

Widjoyanto, Bambang, Abdul Malik Gismar, and Laode M. Syarif, eds. Koruptor Itu Kafir: Telaah Fiqih Korupsi Dalam Muhammadiyah Dan Nahdlatul Ulama (NU). Jakarta: Mizan, 2010.

Yusuf, Muhammad. Merampas Aset Koruptor Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas, 2013.