Analisis Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Surakarta Pada Perkara Ekonomi Syariah (Studi Putusan Nomor 432/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Ska)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v20i1.4611Keywords:
Judges Decision Analysis, Unlawful Acts, Sharia Economic CasesAbstract
This study analyses the results of the decision by the judge of the Religious Court with Case Number: 432/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Ska. This research is a case study analysed with a normative juridical approach. The results showed that the Surakarta Religious Court granted the customer's lawsuit on the grounds of unlawful acts committed by the Sharia Rural Bank of Dana Mulia, namely withholding savings money without clear reasons. Although the defendant filed an exception, the judge rejected it and upheld the defendant's guilt, with both parties sentenced to pay court costs. The judge's decision emphasised that the clause of the agreement between the bank and the customer was a valid basis, so the judge rejected the defendant's exception with the argument that the elements of tort were not fulfilled in the case. This conclusion was supported by legal considerations, including disqualification in person, the judge's assessment of the elements of tort, and the application of Indonesian laws and regulations. This decision has a significant impact on both parties in the settlement of sharia economic case Number 432/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Ska. at the Surakarta Religious Court.
References
Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis. “Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Veritas 7, no. 2 (2021): 37-58.
Anwar, Syamsul. Hukum Perjanjian Syariah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.
Arsyad, Wildana, dan Edi Gunawan. “Ekonomi Syariah Dan Penyelesaiannya Di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah 16, no. 1 (2018): 93-103.
Asyhadi, Farhan. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Tentang Wanprestasi Akad Murabahah (Putusan Nomor 3353/PDT.G/2018/PA.JS).” Buana Ilmu 5, no. 1 (2020): 185-198.
Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 7/46/PBI/2005 tentang Akad Penghimpunan Dan Penyaluran Dana Bagi Bank Yang Melaksanakan Kegiatan Usaha Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah.
Basir, Cik. Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Dan Mahkamah Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
Chakim, M. Lutfi. “Mewujudkan Keadilan Melalui Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 328-352.
El Rahman, Taufiq, et al. “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dan Asas Kepribadian Dalam Kontrak-Kontrak Outsourcing.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 23, no. 3 (2012): 583.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Ed. 2. Cet. 1; Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Ichsan, Nurul. “Akad Bank Syariah." Asy-Syir'ah 50, no. 2 (2016): 399-423.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2022.
Pengadilan Agama Surakarta, Putusan Pengadilan Agama Surakarta Nomor: 432/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Ska
Rahmi, Diana. “Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 13, no. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.18592/syariah.v13i2.174
Rasyid, Abdul, dan Tiska Andita Putri. “sKewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 2 (2019): 159-177.
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Sari, Indah. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11, no. 1 (2020): 53-70.
Sitompul, Roswita. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2014.
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: PT. Inter Masa, 1990.
Waldi, Nopriansyah. Hukum Bisinis Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.
Zatika, Dinda Anna. “Pembukaan Prinsip Kerahasiaan Bank Sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Studi Kasus Bank BCA).” Sasi 26, no. 4 (2020): 500-513.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
