A Mind Mapping : A Strategy to Enhance Students’ English Grammatical Structure


Furqon Edi Wibowo


The goal of this review was to study about the implementation of Mind Mapping in teaching grammar in the second semester of students of the Department of English Education at IAIN Surakarta. Observation and documentation were the instruments for collecting the data. These instruments were used to collect data on the Mind Mapping process in grammar teaching, problems and solutions. The data analysis technique started with data reduction, data display and verification. First, the findings revealed that the implementation of Mind Mapping in teaching grammar was only used to provide an overview of the material. It was developed by elaborating, questioning, and responding techniques or methods for transferring the material. Mind Mapping made the students active in giving feedback and become a measure in assessing  how far the students understood the material during the teaching-learning process, the students were very eager to analyze the material using Mind Mapping. It could be seen from their direct reactions during the teaching-learning process and observed the work of the student in the classroom. Second, there are some advantages to using mind mapping in grammar teaching. They were; (1) giving students an overview of the concept of grammar material; (2) making grammar easier to understand; and (3) helping students to easily memorize the concept of English grammatical structure.


How to Cite
Wibowo, F. E. (2020). A Mind Mapping : A Strategy to Enhance Students’ English Grammatical Structure. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 5(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v6i2.1321


Al-Jarf, R. (2011). Teaching Spelling Skills with A Mind Mapping Software. Asian EFL Journal, 53, 4-16

Bradshaw, W. W. 2013. Huffpost. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-b-bradshaw/why-grammar-is_important_b_4128521.html.

Brown, J. W., lewis, R. B & Harcleroad. F. F. 2004. AV. Intruction:Technology, Media And Method. New York: Prentice Hall.

Budd, John., W. (2003). Mind Maps as Classrom Activities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesotta.

Burhan B. (2005). Analisis Data Penelitian Kulitatif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Buzan, T. (1993). The Mind Map Book. New York: Piguin.

Buzan, T. (2005). The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps. London: Thorsons.

Buzan. T., & Abbot. (2010). Buku Pintar Mind Mapping Untuk Anak. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pusaka Utama.

Buzan, T. (2005). Buku Pintar Mind Map. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Chomsky, N. Conditions On Transformations. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (Eds.). 1973. A Festschrift for Morns Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Pp. 232.

Davies, M. (2011). Mind Mapping, Concept Mapping, Argument Mapping: What are the differences and do they matter. Studies in Higher Education, 62(3), 279-301.

Harold S. Madsen. (1983). Technique in Testing. New York: Oxford Univercity Press.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

Huberman, A. M. & Miles M. B. (1984). Data Management and Analysis Method. In Prof. Dr. Emriz, M. Pd. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta: PR Rajagrafindo Persada.

Ismail S.A.A. (2010). ESP Students’ Views of ESL Grammar Learning. GEMA Onlinetm Journal of Language Studies,10 (3), 143-154.

Kusuma, W. (1996). Cultural Analaysis by Language Used. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Loeb, S. & Dinarski, S. (2017). Descriptive Analaysis in Education : A Guide for Researcher. Washington D.C USA : Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2002). Methodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, Lexy J. MA. (2004). Methodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nia A. 2014 (Sukmadinata, N. S, 2011) . Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dan PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Unpulised thesis.

Novianni A., Nur Aisyah & Furqon E. (2015). Basic English Grammar 2. Surakarta: FATABA Press.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw Hill companies, Inc.

Onesty R, Fitrawati. (2013). Using Word by Word Games in Teaching Grammar for Junior High School Students. 1 (2).

Petrovits, W. (1997). The Role of Context in the Presentation of Grammar. (ELT Journal Volume 51/3), Oxford University Press, 1997.

Richards J.C and Reppen R. (2014). Towards A Pedagogy of Grammar Instruction. RELC Journal, 45 (1) 5-25.

Riswanto & Putra, P. P. (2012). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in The Teaching of Writing at SMAN 3 Bengkulu, Indonesia. International journal of humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 60-68.

Suseno, I & Setyawan, S. (2014). The Effect Of Using Mind Mapping Technique On The Students’ Grammar Achievement. The 61 TEFLIN International Conference: UNS Solo.

Suyanto, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of Mindmapping in Improving Students’ Writing Skill Viewed from Their IQ. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 2(2), 101-119. doi:10.15408/ijee.v2i2.3089.

Widodo, H. P. (2006). Approaches and Procedures for Teaching Grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122-141.

Yen, A. C. (2010). Our Language Clicked: Shakespeare in EFL Classes. Asian EFL journal, 12(4), 33-50.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License