Similes of Woman and Man in the Book of Song of Songs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the types of similes of woman and man in the Bible book, Song of Songs, and their underlying principal metaphor. While the Songs of Songs’ figurative language is commonly analyzed through the lens of historical and pure literary approaches, the authors analyzed it using the cognitive linguistics framework. Qualitative content analysis was employed as the method. The findings showed that the similes of the woman (35) outnumbered similes of the man (12), and they grouped into 7 types, namely Architectural, Artefactual, Botanical, Celestial, Comestible, Topographic, and Zoomorphic. The similes are mostly zoomorphic (13) and botanical (12). The similes represented the woman mainly as A Protected City, while the man as A City Protector. It was argued that the underlying metaphor of all similes of woman and man in the Song of Songs is Love Is Protection. The findings may contribute as an alternative way of reading and understanding figurative language in the Song of Songs.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish in Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Arbel, D. (2000). My vineyard, my very own, is for myself. The Song of Songs, 90–101.
Bamidele, O. (2021). Conceptual metaphor theory in Bible translation and interpretation. Available at SSRN 3890316.
Barbiero, G. (2011). Song of songs. A close reading. Vetus Testamentum/Supplements, 144.
Ciesielska, M., Boström, K. W., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation methods. In qualitative methodologies in organization studies (pp. 33–52). Springer.
Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1163
Evans, V. (2019, July). What is cognitive linguistics? A new paradigm in the study of language and the mind. Psychologytoday.Com. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/language-in-the-mind/201907/what-is-cognitive-linguistics
Fields, E. G. (2018). The case for a mediating approach to Bible translation. GIALens, 12(2), 1–9.
Gault, B. P. (2019). Body as landscape, love as intoxication: conceptual metaphors in the Song of songs. SBL Press.
Hunt, P. (2008). Poetry in the Song of Songs: A literary analysis (Vol. 96). Peter Lang.
James, E. (2017). Battle of the sexes: Gender and the city in the Song of Songs. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 42(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089216670546
Jindo, J. Y. (2018). Biblical metaphor reconsidered: A cognitive approach to poetic prophecy in Jeremiah 1-24. Brill.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th editio). Sage publications.
Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative content analysis: From Kracauer’s beginnings to today’s challenges. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3370
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.103-114 University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lancaster, M. D. (2021). Metaphor research and the Hebrew Bible. Currents in Biblical Research, 19(3), 235–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X20987952
Landy, F. (2020). Erotic words, sacred landscapes, ideal bodies: Love and death in the Song of Songs. A Companion to World Literature, 1–10.
Mkandawire, S. B. (2018). Literacy versus Language: Exploring their similarities and differences. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 2(1), 37–56.
Nissinen, M. (2019). Male agencies in the Song of Songs. In Hebrew Masculinities Anew (pp. 251–273). Sheffield Phoenix Press.
Nyord, R. (2015). Cognitive linguistics. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1).
Shaykhislamov, N. Z. U., & Makhmudov, K. S. U. (2020). Linguistics and tts modern types. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 1, 358–361.
Stasik, A., & Gendźwiłł, A. (2018). Designing a qualitative research project. In qualitative methodologies in organization studies (pp. 223–244). Springer.
van Loon, H. (2018). Metaphor and Biblical exegesis: A proposal. In metaphors in the discussion on suffering in Job 3–31 (pp. 4–34). Brill.
Verde, D. (2016). War-games in the Song of Songs: A reading of song 2, 4 in light of cognitive linguistics. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 30(2), 185–197 https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2016.1226047
Verde, D. (2018). In love as in war. The warlike imagery in Song of Songs. Society of Biblical Literature.
Verde, D. (2020). Conquered conquerors: Love and war in the Song of Songs (Vol. 41). SBL Press.
Watson, W. G. E. (1994). Traditional techniques in classical Hebrew verse. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament/Supplement Series, 170.
Weiss, A. L. (2012). Motives behind Biblical mixed metaphors.” Making a difference: essays on the Bible and Judaism in Honor of Tamara Cohn Eskenazi, 317–328.