Sacred symbols and hate speech: A forensic-pragmatic study of Panji Gumilang’s discourse

Okta Diana Anggrayni; Ina Ika Pratita; Riki Nasrullah

doi:10.30603/al.v10i2.6392

Authors

Okta Diana Anggrayni Master of Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Surabaya
Ina Ika Pratita State University of Surabaya
Riki Nasrullah State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i2.6392

Keywords:

Forensic pragmatics;, hate speech;, Pandji Gumilang’s discourse;, religious symbols

Abstract

Background: Hate speech targeting religious symbols in digital media has sparked complex legal and social debates. Public figures often disseminate ideological views that may violate religious norms and legal provisions.

Aims: This study aims to identify the linguistic forms and pragmatic functions of directive and representative speech acts in Pandji Gumilang’s statements on the Zaytun Official YouTube channel, which were used as evidence in a finalised criminal case.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative method was employed using a forensic pragmatic framework based on Searle's speech act theory. Data were drawn from the Indramayu District Court Verdict No. 365/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Idm using purposive sampling. The analysis focused on speech forms, communicative functions, and violations of Leech's politeness maxims, specifically tact, agreement, modesty, and approbation.

Results: The study found 12 speeches containing hate speech against religious symbols, consisting of four directive speeches and eight representative speeches. All data violates the principles of politeness, especially the maxims of wisdom, agreement, humility, and decency. Statements such as "Indonesia is a sacred land", "not the kalam of Allah", and "strange nasab descendants of the Prophet Saw. show the manipulation of language that functions as an ideological means and has a legal impact.

Implications: Findings reveal that directive and representative speech acts serve as ideological tools undermining Islamic symbols and provoking legal action. This research highlights the utility of forensic pragmatics in examining how language functions as symbolic power and a medium for religion-based offences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ghazo, A. (2024). The force behind illocutionary speech acts: Directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 13(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i3.5181

Al-Zaytun Official. Pernyataan panji gumilang dalam ceramah. (Online), (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0BB-IxsEKU, diakses 12 Mei 2025).

Al-Zaytun Official. Kanal resmi al-zaytun di youtube. (Online), (https://www.youtube.com/c/AlZaytunOfficial, diakses 12 Mei 2025).

Assem, S., & Alansary, S. (2022). Sentiment analysis from subjectivity to (im)politeness detection: Hate speech from a socio-pragmatic perspective. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Language Engineering, ESOLEC 2022, 20(Im), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESOLEC54569.2022.10009298

Elyamany, N., Youssef, Y. O., & Abbas, N. (2025). Forensic analysis of populist discourse and multimodal craft of consensus in Netanyahu’s July 2024 Congressional address. Social Semiotics, 0330(July 2024), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2025.2492162

Etchegaray, C. (2022). Les directives anticipées pour la fin de vie: Actes de langage et ascription. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 114(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.222.0257

Fadhilah, N., & Arimi, S. Inkrah ujaran kebencian atas kasus pencemaran nama baik oleh FA di X : Sebuah Kajian pragmatik forensik. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v15i2.795

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf

Hartini, L., Saifullah, A. R., & Sudana, D. (2020). Linguistik forensik terhadap perbuatan tidak menyenangkan di media sosial (Kajian pragmatik). Deiksis, 12(3), 259-269 https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v12i03.5416

Kamariah, Laksono, K., & Savitri, A. D. (2023). A pragma-dialectical study as a directive speech act pattern of a lecturer to the students in an online learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(9), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i9.6131

Karandeeva, L. G., Stanchuliak, T. G., Popova, S. V., Suyskaya, V. S., & Shvedova, I. V. (2020). The prosody of directive speech acts: Pragmastylistic aspect (on the material of the modern German language). International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2112–2123. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.249

Lavitski, A. A. (2023). Parametric triangulation in forensic linguistic expertise: On the example of insult. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(2), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-2-383-401

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2uWXCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Luo, C., Duan, L., Li, Y., Xie, Q., Wang, L., Ru, K., Nazir, S., Jawad, M., Zhao, Y., Wang, F., Du, Z., Peng, D., Wen, S. Q., Qiu, P., & Fan, H. (2021). Insights from Y-STRs: Forensic characteristics, genetic affinities, and linguistic classifications of Guangdong Hakka and She groups. Frontiers in Genetics, 12(May), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.676917

Oishi, E. (2022). Illocutionary-act-type sensitivity and discursive sequence: An examination of quotation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 19(3), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-3005

Parvaresh, V. (2023). Covertly communicated hate speech: A corpus-assisted pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics, 205, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.009

Peña, J. J., Castillo, F. A. T., & Sanchez, O. E. C. (2022). Identificación de locutor a partir de la fonética forense: Aplicación del software SplitsTree4 para una organización esquemática de los datos lingüísticos. Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua, 2022(71), 431–461. https://doi.org/10.46744/bapl.202201.014

Peng, L., Wang, S., Jiang, H., Wang, K., & Li, G. (2024). Directive vs. commissive illocutionary acts? How illocutionary acts influence citizens’ dissemination behavior of government information. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.349961

Rayon, L. D. (2022). Linguistic oddness in Philippine suicide notes: A forensic discourse analysis. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 30–56. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index

Salama, A. H. Y., & Fawzy, R. M. (2023). The YouTube-induced sequential categorization of the topical device of Amber Heard’s “lies”: An ethnomethodological forensic-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 8(2), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2009

Sardo, A. (2022). Hate speech: A pragmatic assessment of the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, 4(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10054

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/expression-and-meaning/09C632A3876CC93CB12CCDA0E4AE46FD

Sevilla Requena, L. (2024). “She’ll never be a man”: A corpus-based forensic linguistic analysis of misgendering discrimination on X. Languages, 9(9), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090291

Sousa-Silva, R. (2022). Fighting the fake: A forensic linguistic analysis to fake news detection. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(6), 2409–2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09901-w

Susilowati, N. E., Arimi, S., Surahmat, S., & Imamah, F. M. (2023). Alleged case of blasphemy on podcast: Forensic linguistic analysis. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 51(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v51i22023p225.

Syahid, A., Sudana, D., & Bachari, A. D. (2022). Perundungan siber (cyberbullying) bermuatan penistaan agama di media sosial yang berdampak hukum: Kajian linguistik forensik. Semantik, 11(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v11i1.p17-32

Taha, M., Febriningsih, F., Asfar, D. A., Zalmansyah, A., Muzammil, A. R. ul, Ajam, A., Lestari, S. A. B., Zar’in, F., Rauf, R., & Gritantin, L. A. L. (2024). ula Malay’s hate speech in the Sanana jurisdiction: A pragmatic study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1941–1950. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.19

Taufek, W. N. S. W. M., Pritam, H. M. H., Desa, W. N. S. M., Ismail, D., & Mahat, N. A. (2024). Geometric morphometric and pattern discrimination of handwritten numeral characters based on local ethnicities and native linguistic disparities in Malaysia for forensic applications. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 20(5), 1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v20n5.3639

Vidhiasi, D. M., Saifullah, A. R., & Bachari, A. D. (2023). The evaluation of alleged defamation: A forensic linguistics analysis. Al-Lisan, 8(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v8i2.3482

Volio, G. C. (2022). Directive speech acts and ritualized politeness in medieval Spanish. Romanica Cracoviensia, 22(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917RC.22.013.15862