Formative Peer Feedback On Undergraduate Students’ Speaking Ability
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian kualitatif deskriptif ini meneliti persepsi mahasiswa di kelas public speaking menggunakan umpan balik dari teman sebagai nilai fromatif, terutama untuk mahasiswa sarjana yang mempelajari subjek tersebut di Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta. Penelitian ini mengungkapkan persepsi mahasiswa tentang umpan balik dari teman sebagai nilai fromatif dalam menilai berbicara di kelas public speaking. Selain itu, penulis memberikan kuesioner terbuka dan wawancara semi struktur untuk mengetahui bagaimana menerapkan umpan balik dari teman sebagai nilai fromatif, bagian mana yang menarik bagi siswa ketika mereka menilai teman-teman mereka dan untuk mengidentifikasi perasaan siswa ketika menggunakan umpan balik rekan formatif di kelas public speaking. Mengenai hasil penelitian, penulis menemukan bahwa umpan balik dari teman sebagai nilai fromatif sangat bermanfaat bagi mahasiswa sarjana dalam proses pembelajaran kelas berbicara di depan umum. Saat melakukan penilaian, sebagian besar mahasiswa tampaknya lebih tertarik untuk menilai bahasa tubuh rekan mereka dan isi pidato. Selain itu, hasil yang penulis dapatkan dari penyelidikan adalah 62,5% yang mengklaim umpan balik rekan mereka sangat objektif. Selain itu, ketika menggunakan umpan balik rekan formatif di kelas public speaking, 65,6% pelajar sarjana merasa puas.
Unduhan
Rincian Artikel
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish in Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Referensi
Comer, D. K., Clark, C. R., & Canelas, D. A. (2014). Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in introductory-level MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 26-82.
Cook, A. (2019). Using Interactive Learning Activities to Address Challenges of Peer Feedback Systems (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University).
Elizondo-Garcia, J., Schunn, C., & Gallardo, K. (2019). Quality of Peer Feedback in Relation to Instructional Design: A Comparative Study in Energy and Sustainability MOOCs. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1025-1040.
Farias, C., Hastie, P. A., & Mesquita, I. (2018). Scaffolding student–coaches’ instructional leadership toward student-centred peer interactions: A yearlong action-research intervention in sport education. European Physical Education Review, 24(3), 269-291.
Fulcher, G. (2018). Assessing Spoken Production. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6.
Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153-170.
Joo, S. H. (2016). Self-and peer-assessment of speaking. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 16(2).
Leenknecht, M. J., & Prins, F. J. (2018). Formative peer assessment in primary school: the effects of involving pupils in setting assessment criteria on their appraisal and feedback style. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 101-116.
Munoz, A., & Álvarez, M. E. (2007). Students’ objectivity and perception of self assessment in an EFL classroom. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(2), 1-25.
Nicolini, K. M., & Cole, A. W. (2019). Measuring peer feedback in face-to-face and online public-speaking workshops. Communication Teacher, 33(1), 80-93.
Ortoleva, G., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Supporting productive collaboration in a computer-supported instructional activity: peer-feedback on critical incidents in health care education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68(2), 178-197.
Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018). Effects of a formative assessment script on how vocational students generate formative feedback to a peer’s or their own performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 117-143.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
Sridharan, B., & Boud, D. (2019). The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 894-909.
Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2018). Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 745-759.
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032-1047.
Yeh, H. C., Tseng, S. S., & Chen, Y. S. (2019). Using online peer feedback through Blogs to promote speaking performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 1-14.