Strategi Membaca Metakognitif dan Pencapaian Membaca L2: Studi Korelasi EFL di Indonesia
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study aimed to investigate how metacognitive reading strategies correlate with EFL learners’ achievement. Three types of metacognitive reading strategies were measured in this study, namely: global reading strategies, problem-solving reading strategies, and support reading strategies. The data collection was conducted with 56 participants from an ESP reading class at a private university in Yogyakarta. This study found that problem-solving reading strategies and global reading strategies correlated positively with students’ achievement, while support reading strategies correlated negatively with their achievement. However, those correlations were not statistically significant. Therefore, it indicates insufficient evidence to suggest that the same correlations also happened in the population or that the observed correlations might have occurred by chance. Despite the correlations not being statistically significant, in this research, the participants were sampled from the population with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 5%.In addition to the findings, this study provides teachers with an example of a framework for a needs analysis to measure their students’ metacognitive reading strategies and help them plan more informed reading instruction.
Unduhan
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish in Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Referensi
Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, P. G. (2017). EFL learners’ use of online metacognitive reading strategies and tts relation to their self-efficacy in reading. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(2), 117–132.http://www.readingmatrix.com/files/17-097to04m.pdf
Aisah, N., Sutiana, & Nurjamin, R. L. (2021). Metacognitive strategies in student’s reading comprehension. English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 20, 4(1), 169–178.https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal%20journal.v4i1.1103
Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1–15.http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/anderson/article.pdf
Anggraini, M. P., Cahyono, B. Y., Anugerahwati, M., & Ivone, F. M. (2022). The interaction effects of reading proficiency and personality types on EFL university students’ online reading strategy use. Education and Information Technologies,1-19.https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/9672/6258
Annury, M. N., Mujiyanto, J., Saleh, M., & Sutopo, D. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies in EFL reading comprehension. 2, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.13
Aziz, Z. A., Nasir, C., & Ramazani, R. (2019). Applying metacognitive strategies in comprehending English reading texts. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 19(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i1.1863
Cotterall, S., & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing metacognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances and self. System, 37(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.08.003
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (V. Knight (ed.); 4th ed.). SAGE publisher.
Deliany, Z., &Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
Djudin, T. (2017). Using metacognitive strategies to improve reading comprehension and solve a word problem. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 2(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i1.151
Dündar, S. (2016). Determining EFL students awareness of metacognitive reading strategies. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000238666
Fahim, M., & Hoominian, Z. (2014). The relationship between critical thinking ability and reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners. ELT Voices, 4(6), 70-78.https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1065.338&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Fitrisia, D., Tan, K., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Arief, J. T. N. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education (Formerly Known as Journal of Educators and Education), 30(1), 1–16.http://apjee.usm.my/APJEE_30_2015/APJEE%2030%20Art%202%20(15-30).pdf
Ghafournia, N. (2014). Language learning strategy use and reading achievement. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p64
Ismail, N. M., & Tawalbeh, T. I. (2015). Effectiveness of a metacognitive reading strategies program for improving low achieving EFL readers. International Education Studies, 8(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p71
Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. Reading, 11(2), 150–159.http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2011/iwai.pdf
Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. 10(2), 165–180.https://readingmatrix.com/articles/sept_2010/alireza_karbalaei.pdf
Khan, F. A., & Khan, S. A. (2013). Metacognitive reading strategies in relationship with scholastic achievement in science of IX standard students of English medium schools in Aurangabad city. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 119-129.https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2013/v3/i1/1564
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic, constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2465/jmps.115.115h1
Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., &Maarof, N. (2012). Empowering ESL readers with metacognitive reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1250-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.058
Magee, G. A. (2018). Metacognitive reading strategy use and reading comprehension in English of first-year students at a Japanese university.https://web.opar.ehime-u.ac.jp/wp1/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/J16-1_magee.pdf
Mohammadi, E. N., Heidari, F., & Niry, N. D. (2012). The Relationship between critical thinking ability and reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(10), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p192
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Nasab, M. S. B., &Motlagh, S. F. P. (2015). A complete review for metacognitive, cognitive, and social/affective strategies as essential components of learning strategies and their relationships with EFL learners’ reading comprehension promotion. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3), 166-184.http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/1525
Nguyen, L. (2022). Metacognitive strategies on reading English texts of non-English majored students at Dong Nai Technology University, Vietnam: A Mixed Design. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 56-70.https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.3.6
Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). Metacognitive reading strategies of less proficient tertiary learners: a case study of EFL learners at a public university in makassar, indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.049
Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(3), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1997.12085878
Rianto, A. (2021). Indonesian EFL university students' metacognitive online reading strategies before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 16-33.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18110
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Sutiyatno, S., & Sukarno. (2019). A survey study: The correlation between metacognitive strategies and reading achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0904.11
Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435547
Yüksel, I., & Yüksel, I. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164